voices of humanity
Re: [sfcoo] Re: Does the UNA SF Bay COO want to think of itself as a "commons"?
sum
agree.
Mary Jane
-----Original Message-----
From: InterMix <questions@intermix.org>
To: MaryJane Mikuriya <mikuriya@aol.com>
Sent: Sat, Mar 1, 2014 4:57 pm
Subject: [sfcoo] Re: Does the UNA SF Bay COO want to think of itself as a "commons"?
![]()
SF Bay Area Council of Organizations
From: InterMix <questions@intermix.org>
To: MaryJane Mikuriya <mikuriya@aol.com>
Sent: Sat, Mar 1, 2014 4:57 pm
Subject: [sfcoo] Re: Does the UNA SF Bay COO want to think of itself as a "commons"?
The following message was posted on InterMix in the 'SF Bay Area Council of Organizations' forum, where you are a member:
Re: Does the UNA SF Bay COO want to think of itself as a "commons"?
I support a super majority on voting proceedures
rather than conensus.
Consensus is great when is exists - as in unanimous decicions.
If it does not, or cannot exist, then a super majority is best.
- Brian Webster
To respond to this post, log into the Group Forum, or simply reply to this message. If you have problems, write to the moderator at sfcoo-owner@go.intermix.org. To block emails from the Voices of Humanity social media, click here.
SF Bay Area Council of Organizations
